Author Topic: 1954 Izhevsk question  (Read 1896 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

jimsterinalabama

  • SKS Newbie
  • Posts: 5
1954 Izhevsk question
« on: August 29, 2022, 08:37:11 PM »
Many moons ago, when surplus rifles were cheap, I would buy them with no regard to manufacturer. As long as they were cheap. I am now going through my collection in order to see what I have. I was looking at my Russian SKS's. I have a refurb TULA with a mismatched trigger guard and a 1954 Izhevsk all matching, no force matching. I was pleasantly surprised.

jimsterinalabama

  • SKS Newbie
  • Posts: 5
Re: 1954 Izhevsk question
« Reply #1 on: August 29, 2022, 08:41:18 PM »
I forgot my question. How rare are Izzy's?

Logan7

  • SKS Guru
  • **
  • Posts: 2833
Re: 1954 Izhevsk question
« Reply #2 on: August 30, 2022, 06:58:19 PM »
Welcome, Jimster.
What fun to explore into Russian Simonovs - and you have a couple!

That's a good question. My guesstimate for production is Izhevsk's are maybe one in... ten? fifteen? twenty? compared to Tula's production. But Izhevsk's are far less often available for sale here. Folks find them and hold on to them, so the ratio difference on sites like Gunbroker will be even greater.

Am happy to be corrected. Anyone else have an opinion?

One part of the reason is they were made there for only two dated years compared with the nine or so years at Tula (dated + letter years). But another reason might be the difference in SKS production levels outright at those two arsenals; the military's demand fell on Izhevsk for their AK production at the same time. Finally, importers in different countries may have acquired different batches of Russian SKS's for sale, and that may have resulted in different percentages for us and, say, for Canada.

Congrats on having a matching Izhevsk. It is pretty rare and getting more so, and I hope you treat it well.
Care to post some pictures?
« Last Edit: August 30, 2022, 09:03:06 PM by Logan7 »
Lex Malla, Lex Nulla

jimsterinalabama

  • SKS Newbie
  • Posts: 5
Re: 1954 Izhevsk question
« Reply #3 on: August 30, 2022, 11:31:22 PM »
I will try to tomorrow. Thanks for the info.
Jimster

Prince50

  • Board Supporter
  • SKS Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 4045
    • www.bulletbutton.com
Re: 1954 Izhevsk question
« Reply #4 on: August 31, 2022, 01:51:23 PM »
1954 Izzy's are not plentiful, but are much more common than 1953 Izzy rifles. They still bring a premium if all matching, and more so if non-refurb. It is number 4 in rarity for Russian collector rarity in the US.

In order of rarity from my experience
1) Non refurb or light refurb 1949 Russian Tula
2) 1949 heavy refurb Tula
3) 1953 non refurb Izzy
4) 1954 non refurb Izzy.

And from there the refurb Izzy rifles, and all other Tulas. Some people like the transitional 1950,51,52 Tulas. I have never found them to be very collectable.

Regards,

Darin

The collector formerly known as Prince From Sunny SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA www.bulletbutton.com

Chicago mike

  • SKS Gunsmith
  • *
  • Posts: 1004
Re: 1954 Izhevsk question
« Reply #5 on: September 28, 2022, 10:06:50 PM »
I still regret till this day passing on a 53 Izzy at 600$ for a refurb letter k for 300$ at the time it was just to high . Oh well welcome to the sks club .
Living the dream , with the cards god dealt me 😎

Adrianople

  • SKS Plinker
  • *
  • Posts: 51
Re: 1954 Izhevsk question
« Reply #6 on: September 29, 2022, 04:02:37 PM »
"You never pay too much, only too soon"
Did you know "SKS" is spelled the same forward and backward