However it came with all the original parts(stock,handguard, and magazine).
Numrich sells replacement stocks for like $25 and the original "matching numbers" stock is already gone.
If your comment is about the previous owner, then I agree that too many people destroy the collectability of mil-surplus rifles without giving it a second though.
But that's not the case here.
Larry
What I would like to do is put the original parts back on and cut about a 1/2 inch off the back of the stock and add a grind to fit recoil pad with a 3/8” aluminum spacer and stain the stock with a darker(almost ebony)wood stain. I just wasn’t sure if modifying an original stock like that would make it non compliant.
IF the end of the ORIGINAL stock were slightly damaged and would not accept the original butt plate then some minor REPAIRS would not affect compliance. Import was not with the Tapco stock, and MIGHT have been with the wood stock you have.
If your repair allowed an extension pad (many put extensions on the SKS stock) that was made from Rubber, or Anodized Aluminium Alloy, or Plastic to be attached with screws and did not allow ADJUSTMENT in LOP, I don't see anything that would impact compliance.
Sanding and applying a coating, Clear, Green, Blue, Camo or EBONY stain should not impact the function of the stock.
But, cutting it unnecessarily does permanently
destroy alter the ORIGINALITY of a war relic, war ERA relic, or a Commercial War Era Clone. I would evaluate the Historical value, then proceed.
Now, a replacement stock would allow you to keep the ORIGINAL stock intact if you wanted. It might be far fetched but maybe it would need to be a Chinese stock for a Chinese rifle, Russian for a Russian, but some have been imported with parts from mixed countries, so who knows. I not being a lawyer and all.
So,
You got a SKS, Tapco stock, wood stock, and Tech Sights for $300.
Yup, that be a deal.
Welcome back after your absence.
I hope the stain goes on even