Should individuals and FFLs be in possession of a firearm with an attached “stabilizing brace” such that the firearm constitutes a firearm under the NFA in addition to the GCA, the affected persons or FFLs would need to choose one of the following options:
• Turn the entire firearm with an attached “stabilizing brace” into ATF;
• Convert the firearm into a long-barreled rifle;
• Apply to register under the NFA; or
• Remove and destroy the “stabilizing brace.”
With the ATFs final rules on pistol braces coming in December, the question of what to do with such firearms comes to mind. Assuming a last minute reprieve from the SCOTUS does not happen, I would be interested in what folks are considering . . .
I expect most folks will take the third option and go the SBR route. I'm not so certain that NFA restrictions are such a great idea -- though I'm undecided. To hedge my bets, I'm already in possession of the parts (replacement barrels and barrel extensions) necessary if I take the second option and convert mine into "rifles".
BTW: Because I expect a lot of folks will go with the second option, I predict that such parts will be in expensive and in short supply come December. Prolly a good idea to get yours sooner rather than later if you're planning on the conversion.
Larry
PS: Note: There are rumors of some sort of "amnesty" regarding such firearms. Most people are thinking this means that ATF will forego the $200 payment for the tax stamp. However that's by no means a certainty, so folks going the SBR route should at the least folks should plan of budgeting $200 per -- that way you won't be caught off guard.
PPS: For those living under a rock for the last year:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HUFxpmNtZ9I.